hamiltonyang
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit hamiltonyang's Xanga Site!

Name: Hamilton


Message: message me
AIM: thefobbysystm


Member Since: 4/6/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
CBCCOC SRHI Fellowship
previous - random - next

Interact of University High School
previous - random - next

University High School
previous - random - next

OC^2eC
previous - random - next

++UHS ~Uni~ Class of 05++
previous - random - next

UCI
previous - random - next

InterVarsity - UCI
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Monday, February 09, 2009

I can't believe people still use this thing, lol


Saturday, August 09, 2008

Thoughts on Dark Knight

Posted from my facebook note.


The recent Batman movie is probably the best thing that has hit the screens in years. There's no denying that fact. You can't deny the raw sales figures, the endless streams of praise from friends and family (most of whom have watched it 2+ times, helping the former), and its own artistic merit. It's just undeniably a great movie, which is something that hasn't and can't be said about anything for quite a while. And I agree, which is what troubles me.

I should be someone who hates the Dark Knight, and if you're not fan of the Bush Administration, you should be too. The situation in Batman is President Bush’s wet dream: there exist dangerous criminals that are so dangerous and so irrational that they can’t be dealt with by normal, legal means. Not that the public wants to anyway, seeing the brutality of this enemy. So every branch of the government: the courts, the mayor, the police – all hand their powers over to a masked vigilante named Batman, entrusting him with all resources and hope that he might finish the job.

To achieve his purposes, Batman siphons company funds toward paying for luxury dinners, fundraising events, and his menagerie of gadgetry. He even uses his own company funds and resources to tap into the cellular network of every Gotham citizen, creating a wiretapped network that even the NSA would be jealous of. Batman then forms secret deals and plots with the city’s law enforcement agencies, away from public scrutiny, hoping that these plans will result in the capture of the Joker. I say hope, because at the end, after one dead girlfriend and one scorched district attorney, not to mention scores of dead innocents, is running away from the people he swore to protect, while his real enemy is still at large.

In a time when the war and the administration is so unpopular, it is surprising that a movie like Batman, the undertones of which so closely mirrors everything we loathe about our government, is enjoying such popularity. Wouldn’t cheering on Batman be like hating freedom?

If Batman is an example of a thinly-veiled attempt at justifying America’s war on terror, then it is interesting to note the recent films criticizing America’s war on terror have done horrible at the box offices. Rendition, Redacted, are both movies that you probably don’t even remember because they did so badly at the box offices. But those were two movies that highlighted the ambiguity of international warfare, where one person’s freedom fighter is another’s terrorist, and in the middle of this, there will be collateral damage and innocents will suffer and die. Real-life situations are a bit more nuanced than superhero flicks, and as such, they make for terrible entertainment on the silver screen.

Yet Batman, though its message is conservative, the medium which carries that message undermines the message itself. Batman is, after all, a movie about a comic hero (read: manufactured from our own imagination) whose virtues we would not readily expect to crystallize in everyday life. Put simply, one goes into the Dark Knight expecting fantasy, and fantasy is what they get. It is a sort of escape, an ideal which we recognize to be desirable but unreachable. The conservatives, then, are pursuing a foreign policy which makes sense only in fantasy.

Which is why I think the movie is so beautiful. It refuses to be the spokesperson for either left or right wing politics. The morality present in Batman isn’t just based on simple conservative values like absolutely morality, loyalty, deferment of the good, and a crusader attitude of fighting for the unqualified good. Nor is it liberal, which prizes healthy skepticism, self-criticism, and a certain degree of epistemic humility.

I absolutely loved the last scene of Batman, where he displays that a hero is not always an objective ideal that at times can present a moral challenge to the protected, but the constructions of a hero are subject on the crowd’s whims. If we need Batman to fight crime, he will fight crime. If we need someone to blame, we will blame him. That Batman is willing to be whoever he needs to be - the lonely prophet, the ignoble warrior, the repository of morality, the scapegoat – is what separates him from the Bush administration. Bruce Wayne is humble enough (and financially secure enough that he doesn’t have to worry about Congress) to realize that his persona as the masked crusader is always in the service of the people. If they need a hero, he will be that hero. But if they need a villain, he will be that villain. He can sacrifice himself on whatever altar that is necessary to preserve the masses’ feelings of innocence and moral purity, even while those same masses will never be willing to join in on the same fight that Batman is engaged in.

We all think that we know right from wrong. Of course, there is no disagreement that free speech is better than censorship, that peace is better than war, and that love is better than hate. That kind of thing seems to be common sense. But then again, we also don’t seriously consider situations where love requires us to hate, that peace may require war, and that our freedom of speech always require some form of censorship. We revel in our unflinching moral compass, passing judgment on those whose power makes their choices moral ambivalent.

The end of The Dark Knight is more of a judgment on the people that Batman protects than on Batman himself. We, the masses, need moral scapegoats to protect our sense of innocence. Let’s not forget the Batman in our lives.


Thursday, June 12, 2008

I am back for a little bit... stuff I've been reading

I just finished another school year! Yay! This blog has seen the neglect resulting from weeks and months of work overload. But I have not been vegging out - here are some of the best articles/stories I've read over the last couple of weeks. I'll try to give you a brief synopsis of each:

Scriptural Guidelines for Assessing Revival
An Assemblies of God thinktank discusses what the Bible qualifies as "revival". I think it's a helpful document in that it's not opposed to revival (heck, it's even from AoG), but it does have a few words of caution that I think are relevant especially for the recent revival stuff happening in SoCal.

Beliefnet has been running a series of Blogalogues - debates on controversial topics in the Christian life. What separates this from any other debate is that they've picked some of the top thinkers to discuss these topics: NT Wright, Jim Wallis, Rausenbusch, Bill Hybel, Orson Scott Card... the list goes on and on.
Check it out here. Look for the debate topics on the right hand panel.

So I've been busy trying to keep my head above the water with all the news, schoolwork, fellowship and church stuff. It's looking like a good summer already, and it's only been the first day!

I will be updating with summer plans soon. Stay tuned :]




I am back for a little bit... stuff I've been reading

I just finished another school year! Yay! This blog has seen the neglect resulting from weeks and months of work overload. But I have not been vegging out - here are some of the best articles/stories I've read over the last couple of weeks. I'll try to give you a brief synopsis of each:

Scriptural Guidelines for Assessing Revival
An Assemblies of God thinktank discusses what the Bible qualifies as "revival". I think it's a helpful document in that it's not opposed to revival (heck, it's even from AoG), but it does have a few words of caution that I think are relevant especially for the recent revival stuff happening in SoCal.

Beliefnet has been running a series of Blogalogues - debates on controversial topics in the Christian life. What separates this from any other debate is that they've picked some of the top thinkers to discuss these topics: NT Wright, Jim Wallis, Rausenbusch, Bill Hybel, Orson Scott Card... the list goes on and on.
Check it out here. Look for the debate topics on the right hand panel.

So I've been busy trying to keep my head above the water with all the news, schoolwork, fellowship and church stuff. It's looking like a good summer already, and it's only been the first day!

I will be updating with summer plans soon. Stay tuned :]




Friday, May 16, 2008

Quake Pictures



YingXiu... look at the rubble. Haven't seen destruction like that since Kosovo






^A mother cries out for the attention of the rescue crew after spotting her son in the wreckage






Next 5 >>